I would like to get some help on testing
on FreeBSD ports (you should be able to patch it on base Clang). The change
may be a part of the coming C++20, and we want to know its impact on real-world
code. The change has been ran on Google's code base, and the result is generally
Created attachment 210160 [details]
New failure logs:
Around 300 ports were skipped due to those new failures
(In reply to Antoine Brodin from comment #2)
Thanks. Finished analyzing these ports. Before I digging deeper (by patching a few ports to unblock the skipped ones), I want to ask:
1. How many ports in the ports tree are expected to be built with base clang++?
2. How many ports depends on java/openjfx8-devel, www/webkit2-gtk3, and www/node10?
Created attachment 210477 [details]
Uploaded patch to fix the 7 ports in the ports tree. See if they can unblock the 300 ports that are skipped. Can @ports exp-run the two patches? Thanks.
Exp-run looks fine with the ports patch applied.
With www/webkit2-gtk3 2.28.4 the file patched has been moved to Source/WebCore/style/StyleResolver.cpp; the hunk remains the same. The port builds successfully after making this adjustment.