Bug 244799 - net/avahi: update to 0.8
Summary: net/avahi: update to 0.8
Status: Closed DUPLICATE of bug 250354
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: --- Affects Only Me
Assignee: freebsd-gnome (Nobody)
Depends on:
Blocks: 249745
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2020-03-13 22:33 UTC by unrelentingtech
Modified: 2020-12-13 10:54 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
bugzilla: maintainer-feedback? (gnome)

avahi-undo-qt5.patch (38.43 KB, patch)
2020-03-13 22:33 UTC, unrelentingtech
no flags Details | Diff
avahi-0.8.patch (29.73 KB, patch)
2020-03-13 22:33 UTC, unrelentingtech
no flags Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description unrelentingtech 2020-03-13 22:33:16 UTC
Created attachment 212392 [details]

Avahi 0.8 was released 2020-02-18.

ABI of client libraries is backwards compatible: https://abi-laboratory.pro/index.php?view=timeline&l=avahi

For some reason some files are missing from the tarball — the build-db script (required for py-avahi) and the bssh and avahi-discover manpages (who cares).
Had to download build-db from github.

For easier reviewing, the patch is split into two parts.

Patch 1 partially reverts "Add avahi-qt5 which links against Qt5." which a backport of something that's included in 0.8 now.
Comment 1 unrelentingtech 2020-03-13 22:33:56 UTC
Created attachment 212393 [details]

Patch 2 is the actual update.
Comment 2 Rene Ladan freebsd_committer 2020-11-16 21:44:25 UTC
If I `git apply avahi-undo-qt5.patch` and then `git apply avahi-0.8.patch` on top of that the first part succeeds (with a whitespace error) but the second part fails.
Comment 3 Rene Ladan freebsd_committer 2020-12-12 11:32:06 UTC
Greg and Olivier: how does this PR relate to 250354, they seem to pursue more or less the same goal?
Comment 4 unrelentingtech 2020-12-12 16:50:57 UTC
(In reply to Rene Ladan from comment #3)
Mine is worse, 250354 seems like a better one
Comment 5 Rene Ladan freebsd_committer 2020-12-13 10:54:35 UTC
Closed in favor of 250354 which seems to be a better approach.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 250354 ***