Bug 248704 - [REVIVE] www/mod_jail: Apache module to enable an easy alternative to mod_chroot
Summary: [REVIVE] www/mod_jail: Apache module to enable an easy alternative to mod_chroot
Status: Open
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: --- Affects Only Me
Assignee: freebsd-apache (Nobody)
Keywords: feature, needs-qa
Depends on:
Reported: 2020-08-17 17:04 UTC by Ethan Fouts
Modified: 2020-08-25 21:46 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:

The reconstructed port (2.66 KB, text/plain)
2020-08-17 17:07 UTC, Ethan Fouts
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ethan Fouts 2020-08-17 17:04:09 UTC
This port has reached its expiration date and I’m here to show that the port can still be of use.

The google code project link provided was returning a 404 http error. The Makefile now includes a updated link to the github repository where the source code can be fetched without returning a 404 http code.

Included is a diff file that shows the changed from before the port expired. I’ll also attach a shar file of the port in case it’s needed.
Comment 1 Ethan Fouts 2020-08-17 17:07:26 UTC
Created attachment 217282 [details]
The reconstructed port
Comment 2 Li-Wen Hsu freebsd_committer 2020-08-18 19:53:48 UTC
Over to apache@ team, this seems have nothing to do with office@.

Ethan, instead of asking apache@ to maintain this port again, do you want to maintain this port?
Comment 3 Jochen Neumeister freebsd_committer 2020-08-20 21:02:19 UTC
this weekend, I'm gonna take a look at the PR

joneum (part of Apache)
Comment 4 Michael Osipov 2020-08-21 20:22:44 UTC
There is concrete support for GitHub in the ports framework.
Comment 5 Ethan Fouts 2020-08-25 21:46:27 UTC
I could certainly do that. Is it appropriate to ask here for what it entails in the pursuit of become a maintainer?