Created attachment 219007 [details] clinfo output $ pkg install clinfo intel-compute-runtime $ clinfo [...] NOTE: your OpenCL library declares to support OpenCL 2.2, but it seems to support up to OpenCL 1.0 only. NOTE: your OpenCL library only supports OpenCL 1.0, but some installed platforms support OpenCL 3.0. Programs using 3.0 features may crash or behave unexpectedly
Maintainer informed via mail
ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de and ohartmann@walstatt.org are probably the same person, so requesting maintainer-feedback flag.
Created attachment 219902 [details] Adapt OpenCL API 3.0 Attached you'll find a pacth file against the ports tree devel/opencl, adapting latest released API 3.0 standard as well as updated maintainer eMail (myself). Have not fully tested the compliance of the new API 3.0 against depending ports!
Created attachment 220004 [details] ocl-icd 2.2.13 clinfo still claimed "OpenCL 2.2" until ocl-icd was updated. https://github.com/OCL-dev/ocl-icd/compare/v2.2.12...v2.2.13
Created attachment 220005 [details] clinfo 3.0.20.11.20 clinfo itself also needed to support OpenCL 3.0 for the warning to completely disappear. https://github.com/Oblomov/clinfo/compare/2.2.18.04.06...3.0.20.11.20
Created attachment 220006 [details] clinfo output for OpenCL 3.0
Created attachment 220007 [details] clpeak 1.1.0 clpeak didn't like opencl update after https://github.com/KhronosGroup/OpenCL-CLHPP/commit/432b551429b3 In file included from src/common.cpp:1: include/common.h:4:10: fatal error: 'CL/cl.hpp' file not found #include <CL/cl.hpp> ^~~~~~~~~~~ https://github.com/krrishnarraj/clpeak/compare/1.1.0-rc2...1.1.0 https://github.com/krrishnarraj/clpeak/commit/db42d30028ba
Comment on attachment 219902 [details] Adapt OpenCL API 3.0 Can you rebase against current ports/ tree? $ make ===> Patching for opencl-3.0 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for opencl-3.0 from /usr/ports/devel/opencl/files 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to cl_platform.h.rej ===> FAILED Applying FreeBSD patch-cl__platform.h ===> FAILED to apply cleanly FreeBSD patch(es) patch-cl__platform.h *** Error code 1 > -PORTVERSION= 2.2 > -PORTREVISION= 2 > +PORTVERSION= 3.0 [...] > -COMMENT= Open Computing Language (OpenCL) specifications V2.2 (header files) > +COMMENT= Open Computing Language (OpenCL) specifications V3.0 (header files) [...] > -These header are covering OpenCL API 2.2 > +These header are covering OpenCL API 3.0 Why duplicate OpenCL version in COMMENT and pkg-descr? > -LICENSE= unknown > +LICENSE= Apache 2.0 Define LICENSE=APACHE20 instead and drop other LICENSE_* variables. Otherwise, it fails to build: ===> License not correctly defined: multiple licenses in LICENSE, but LICENSE_COMB is set to single (or undefined) make: exec(exit) failed (No such file or directory) > -CONFLICTS= opencl-1.[0-2] > +CONFLICTS= opencl-[1-2].[0-2] CONFLICTS has no impact on current package. If no other package is named "opencl" then CONFLICTS can be dropped. > -CLHPP_TAG= 8b6a312 > +CLHPP_TAG= 524f5ca benchmarks/clpeak needs header from a newer CLHPP snapshot. Can you update and include CL/opencl.hpp? In file included from src/logger.cpp:1: In file included from include/logger.h:12: include/common.h:8:10: fatal error: 'CL/opencl.hpp' file not found #include <CL/opencl.hpp> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Created attachment 220045 [details] OpenCL API 3.0, including recent OpenCL-HPP project's opencl.hpp header file. According to some mistakes made on a non-recent ports tree and some issues with other related ports, this patch tries to adapt from the issues reported herein.
Created attachment 220046 [details] Update devel/ocl-icd to v2.2.13 to fit OCL API 3.0 Made some minor changes to Jan Beichs patch. I should put this issue into a dedicated PR.
LGTM for the clpeak patch.
A commit references this bug: Author: jbeich Date: Mon Nov 30 21:07:02 UTC 2020 New revision: 556679 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/556679 Log: devel/opencl: update to 3.0 - Update MAINTAINER address - Define LICENSE as standard - Drop CONFLICTS against itself PR: 250562 Submitted by: O. Hartmann (maintainer) Changes: head/devel/opencl/Makefile head/devel/opencl/distinfo head/devel/opencl/files/ head/devel/opencl/pkg-descr head/devel/opencl/pkg-plist
A commit references this bug: Author: jbeich Date: Mon Nov 30 21:07:30 UTC 2020 New revision: 556680 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/556680 Log: devel/ocl-icd: update to 2.2.13 - Drop obsolete CONFLICTS after r438910 Changes: https://github.com/OCL-dev/ocl-icd/compare/v2.2.12...v2.2.13 PR: 250562 Approved by: O. Hartmann (maintainer) Changes: head/devel/ocl-icd/Makefile head/devel/ocl-icd/distinfo head/devel/ocl-icd/files/patch-icd__generator.rb head/devel/ocl-icd/files/patch-ocl__icd__loader.c head/devel/ocl-icd/pkg-descr
A commit references this bug: Author: jbeich Date: Mon Nov 30 21:07:36 UTC 2020 New revision: 556681 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/556681 Log: benchmarks/clpeak: update to 1.1.0 Changes: https://github.com/krrishnarraj/clpeak/compare/1.1.0-rc2...1.1.0 PR: 250562 Approved by: jmd (maintainer) Changes: head/benchmarks/clpeak/Makefile head/benchmarks/clpeak/distinfo
Still waiting for devel/clinfo update approval.
Comment on attachment 220045 [details] OpenCL API 3.0, including recent OpenCL-HPP project's opencl.hpp header file. This version was still bitrotten, so I've salvaged bare minimum. Please, resubmit the remaining changes in a separate bug. $ make clean all ===> Cleaning for opencl-3.0 ===> License not correctly defined: multiple licenses in LICENSE, but LICENSE_COMB is set to single (or undefined) make: exec(exit) failed (No such file or directory) *** Error code 1 $ make clean all DISABLE_LICENSES= ===> Cleaning for opencl-3.0 ===> opencl-3.0 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by opencl-3.0 for building ===> Extracting for opencl-3.0 => SHA256 Checksum OK for KhronosGroup-OpenCL-Headers-3.0-b04034a_GH0.tar.gz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for KhronosGroup-OpenCL-CLHPP-64c206f_GH0.tar.gz. ===> Patching for opencl-3.0 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for opencl-3.0 from /usr/ports/default/devel/opencl/files 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to cl_platform.h.rej ===> FAILED Applying FreeBSD patch-cl__platform.h ===> FAILED to apply cleanly FreeBSD patch(es) patch-cl__platform.h *** Error code 1
Comment on attachment 220046 [details] Update devel/ocl-icd to v2.2.13 to fit OCL API 3.0 This version was still bitrotten, so I've salvaged bare minimum. Please, resubmit the remaining changes in a separate bug. $ make clean all ===> Cleaning for ocl-icd-2.2.13 ===> License BSD2CLAUSE accepted by the user ===> ocl-icd-2.2.13 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by ocl-icd-2.2.13 for building ===> Extracting for ocl-icd-2.2.13 => SHA256 Checksum OK for OCL-dev-ocl-icd-v2.2.13_GH0.tar.gz. ===> ocl-icd-2.2.13 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/ruby27 - found ===> Patching for ocl-icd-2.2.13 ===> ocl-icd-2.2.13 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/ruby27 - found ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for ocl-icd-2.2.13 from /usr/ports/devel/ocl-icd/files Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to icd_generator.rb.rej ===> FAILED Applying FreeBSD patch-icd__generator.rb ===> FAILED to apply cleanly FreeBSD patch(es) patch-icd__generator.rb *** Error code 1
Ping. I still need x11@ approval for attachment 220005 [details].
Ping. I can't use "maintainer timeout" with x11@ ports, so, please, don't ignore the approval request.
Approved. x11 isn't in the maintainer approval field.
A commit references this bug: Author: jbeich Date: Sat Dec 12 10:44:12 UTC 2020 New revision: 557809 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/557809 Log: devel/clinfo: update to 3.0.20.11.20 Changes: https://github.com/Oblomov/clinfo/compare/2.2.18.04.06...3.0.20.11.20 PR: 250562 Approved by: manu Changes: head/devel/clinfo/Makefile head/devel/clinfo/distinfo
(In reply to Emmanuel Vadot from comment #20) > x11 isn't in the maintainer approval field. I did complain to bugmeister@ years ago the distinction between maintainer-approval attachment flag and maintainer-feedback bug flag is confusing. Many maintainers still abuse maintainer-feedback for approval e.g., jmd@ here. ;)
A commit in branch main references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=6094a5284f6a9a0ce938169f7761aa1d1198439e commit 6094a5284f6a9a0ce938169f7761aa1d1198439e Author: O. Hartmann <ohartmann@walstatt.org> AuthorDate: 2021-10-23 15:33:20 +0000 Commit: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> CommitDate: 2021-11-12 18:16:49 +0000 devel/ocl-icd: update to 2.3.1 Changes: https://github.com/OCL-dev/ocl-icd/compare/v2.2.13...v2.3.1 PR: 250562 devel/ocl-icd/Makefile | 4 ++-- devel/ocl-icd/distinfo | 6 +++--- devel/ocl-icd/pkg-plist | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)