Created attachment 220143 [details] screenshot root@mowa219-gjp4-8570p:~ # uname -v FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #72 r367936: Sun Nov 22 21:46:00 GMT 2020 root@mowa219-gjp4-8570p:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/GENERIC-NODEBUG root@mowa219-gjp4-8570p:~ # pkg query '%o %v %R' net-mgmt/bandwhich net-mgmt/bandwhich 0.20.0 FreeBSD Screenshot attached. If I recall correctly, an earlier version of bandwhich did successfully show process names or IDs.
(In reply to Graham Perrin from comment #0) I tried running the port on my own machine, and it showed names for the various processes I had running at the time ('firefox', 'openvpn' etc.). ❯ uname -v FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE-p1 GENERIC ❯ pkg query '%o %v %R' net-mgmt/bandwhich net-mgmt/bandwhich 0.20.0_1 FreeBSD I also checked the previous version (0.19.0) just to be sure, and it behaved in the same way. Your screenshot shows a copy of Transmission running, I assume it's the process that is being reported as <UNKNOWN>. The author lists a few reasons why a process might be listed as <UNKNOWN> in a previous GH issue: https://github.com/imsnif/bandwhich/issues/149#issuecomment-593577947 The FreeBSD port uses lsof under the bonnet. Have you checked what it shows when Transmission is running? Do any other processes show up on the list?
Is it a problem with lsof on 13-CURRENT
It continues to show a single <UNKNOWN> whilst (for example) running Firefox; and before, during and after a start of Thunderbird. Apparently a single process with a rising number of connections, as Thunderbird makes its connections. I start Falkon, the number of connections for <UNKNOWN> rises; I quit Falkon, the number drops. And so on. bandwhich aside for a moment, <https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2020-November/077655.html> there's a suggestion to use fstat. Elsewhere recently I read stronger discouragement from relying upon lsof on FreeBSD. Not bookmarked (sorry) but if I do find the technical discussion again, I'll add something here. Note to self: not found in #freebsd on IRC. In the meantime: <https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=lsof#BUGS> I see <https://github.com/imsnif/bandwhich/issues/149#issuecomment-629828150> but whether fstat is feasible for bandwhich, I have no idea.
(In reply to Graham Perrin from comment #3) > … Elsewhere recently I read stronger discouragement from > relying upon lsof on FreeBSD. … Found. I added the relevant quote to <https://github.com/imsnif/bandwhich/issues/149#issuecomment-748452835>