Created attachment 220722 [details] gdal 3.2.0 graphics/gdal: Update to 3.2.0 - Update to 3.2.0 - Add sane options as usual, https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224004#c38 The 3.2.0 release is a new feature release with the following highlights: * New GDAL drivers: – [ESRIC](https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/esric.html): ESRI bundle cache read-only driver (#2663) – [HEIF](https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/heif.html): read-only driver for HEIF/HEIC file. Requires libheif – [OGCAPI](https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/ogcapi.html): tiles/maps/coverage raster/vector experimental driver – [TGA](https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/tga.html): read/only driver to read TGA image file format * New OGR drivers: – [LVBAG](https://gdal.org/drivers/vector/lvbag.html): read-only support for Dutch LVBAG/Kadaster 2.0 vector format * New utilities: – [gdal_create](https://gdal.org/programs/gdal_create.htm): to create/initialize a new raster file * Other improvements: – Multi-threaded overview computation (if GDAL_NUM_THREADS set) – COG driver: TILING_SCHEME creation option – OpenFileGDB driver: add support for using spatial indexes – BAG driver: multiple improvements – FITS driver: multiple improvements (MEF and binary table support) – NITF driver: support for SNIP TREs – OGRFieldDefn: support UNIQUE constraint – OGRFieldDefn: support a AlternativeName (alias) property (#2729) – Python bindings: move implementation of scripts (except gdal2tiles) in osgeo.utils package to be reusable – Faster GTIFF Deflate compression/decompression through libdeflate (if using internal libtiff or libtiff > 4.1.0) * Removed functionality: – API_PROXY mechanism: likely never used for real usage. – Removal of GDAL and OGR ArcSDE drivers Tested with qgis/qgis-ltr, saga, grass7, postgis, etc... all gis softwares
I'll submit another PR for exp-run. BTW, is it intentional to put geos 3.9.0 in attachment 220722 [details]?
(In reply to Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh from comment #1) No sorry.
(In reply to Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh from comment #1) Why another PR? We can ask an exp-run on this patch? BTW, I have already done the tests on my machines. There is a new version 3.2.1, I can push it if you want, but I'd like to avoid another problem like this one: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=553000 Thanks. Loïc
ah ah... it has already been committed and version 3.2.1 is already present. and still without those default options that are necessary. I throw in the towel.