Hi Mark, Here is a port for Sublime Text 4. Sublime now uses a versioning system based on builds, so this does not need ports linked to the version like editors/linux-sublime3. I called it linux-sublime-text to differentiate it from linux-sublime-merge (see https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256061). Thanks in advance for your help! Best, Matías
Created attachment 225179 [details] Initial port shar
editors/linux-sublime-text: v4 (and ongoing) of the renowned sophisticated text editor for code, markup and prose. This is the initial shar file. The port: * installs icons * installs desktop entry * requires Linuxulator * installs license This supersedes editors/linux-sublime and editors/linux-sublime3 as Sublime Text is now licensed in a version-agnostic fashion and does not require a major-version specific port. Ports for versions 2 and 3 should still be kept to cater for users who hold legacy licenses. Name has been changed to linux-sublime-text to differentiate it from linux-sublime-merge (see https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256061). Sublime Text may be downloaded and evaluated for free, however a license must be purchased for continued use. passes QA - portlint: OK (looks fine.) - testport: OK (poudriere: 130amd64) - portclippy: OK (all green) - portfmt -D: OK (no warning) (this comment obsoletes all previous comments)
Incorrectly named `editors/sublime-text4', which is apparently what you've ported, had been committed to the tree in June. Assigning to the current maintainer so you can sort this out together.
I ported Sublime Text 4 under editor/sublime-text4 because it made sense to me. Also, since Sublime Text 3 was always asking for upgrades, I made the port that way I can upgrade every time that Sublime Text as a new version. I use Sublime Text every day for work, and when I work on code for GhostBSD or update a FreeBSD port. If I have to rename it linux-sublime-text4 that is not a problem.
Since the port already exists, should I close this?