Comment 1 Daniel Engberg 2022-10-26 20:32:40 UTC

Runtime tested?
Does it pass Poudriere?

See also PR 267323

Comment 2 Daniel Engberg 2022-10-26 20:32:52 UTC

Err, I meant 266415

If you want to push 266415 then please do. We have users asking for this for all of 2022. Tested 3.10.0(_x) with varying degrees of success before, the software itself isn't great but right now it needs exposure via ports in order to fix the issues they have.

check-orphans and stage-qa targets pass.

I will need time to see if it breaks for me, like the last one did.  I am not sure if breaking ddclient for some population of users is the right way to do ports.  What about creating a ddclient-devel port?

Fine by me, but I'm not a ports committer.

I have tested this version and it is much the same as the last version:

FAILED:   <redacted>: unexpected status (14)
 Use of uninitialized value $h in hash element at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 4105.
Use of uninitialized value $_[0] in sprintf at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 2163.
WARNING:  updating : nochg: No update required; unnecessary attempts to change to the current address are considered abusive
Use of uninitialized value $h in hash element at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 4114.
Use of uninitialized value $h in hash element at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 4115.
Use of uninitialized value $h in hash element at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 4116.
Use of uninitialized value $h in hash element at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 4105.
Use of uninitialized value $_[0] in sprintf at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 2163.
FAILED:   updating : unexpected status (0)
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 1157.
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 1157.
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 1157.
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 1157.
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 1157.
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 1157.
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 1157.
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 1157.
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 1157.
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 1157.
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 1157.
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 1157.
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 1157.
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 1157.
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 1157.
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 1157.
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 1157.
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/local/sbin/ddclient line 1157.
FAILED:    was not updated because protocol <undefined> is not supported.

Note: I re-created my ddclient.conf file, starting from the sample provided, and then re-entered my dyndns provider settings, so I think this is likely a bug in the code.

Comment 3 suggests there are some communities wanting this version, but that there are known problems with the ddclient code.  My suggestion is a ports committer creates a ddclient-devel port, assigns maintainer to Franco, and commits this version there.

Matthew

Closing as 3.11.0 is near and since this didn't progress I have had to maintain my own up-to-date ddclient port copy elsewhere.