<https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/handbook/book/#bibliography> Rationalise the content of this bibliography with content elsewhere, including at least: 1) <https://papers.freebsd.org/> – the collected works of the FreeBSD community as presented at various conferences and summits 2) <https://github.com/DiscoverBSD/awesome-bsd> – A collection of awesome BSD related stuff 3) <https://people.freebsd.org/~grahamperrin/273360/273360-hacked-for-images.pdf> (books on pages 1–10, magazines 19–20) 4) The UNIX system family tree: Research and BSD. Re: (4), from a first look at <https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/blob/9e589b0938579f3f4d89fa5c051f845bf754184d/share/misc/bsd-family-tree#L879-L887>: * the first of the two UNIX® books is missing from the UNIX history part of the Bibliography in the FreeBSD Handbook – and so on. Use normal paragraphs, not bullet points. Markup/style is inconsistent. Entries are disorderly. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_690#Bibliography> under 'External links', the first two excerpts can be useful.
This section has been reviewed as part of the handbook working group. I close it as not accepted.
If not in the FreeBSD Handbook, I can at least aim to make things orderly and suitably elsewhere.
(In reply to Graham Perrin from comment #2) No
(In reply to Graham Perrin from comment #2) > suitably elsewhere. Sorry, I missed a word. Suitably styled elsewhere. Also, sorry that I didn't see proposed changes before they were made. Unless I'm missing something, no review in Phabricator; no signal to the docs group (people who are willing to review documentation changes).