Bug 38071 - Update: shells/pdksh (5.2.14.2)
Summary: Update: shells/pdksh (5.2.14.2)
Status: Closed FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: Normal Affects Only Me
Assignee: Thomas Gellekum
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2002-05-14 11:10 UTC by Cyrille Lefevre
Modified: 2002-05-17 23:00 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments
file.diff (1.50 KB, patch)
2002-05-14 11:10 UTC, Cyrille Lefevre
no flags Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Cyrille Lefevre 2002-05-14 11:10:01 UTC
	Makefile
		PORTVERSION bumped
		DISTNAME, PATCH_* added
		post-patch added (to add patchlevel to version)
	files/patch-aa
		deleted
	distinfo
		updated

How-To-Repeat: 	n/a
Comment 1 Ying-Chieh Liao freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2002-05-14 13:09:06 UTC
Responsible Changed
From-To: freebsd-ports->tg

over to maintainer
Comment 2 Thomas Gellekum freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2002-05-15 12:49:16 UTC
State Changed
From-To: open->closed

Committed, with minor changes. Thanks.
Comment 3 Cyrille Lefevre 2002-05-17 22:51:39 UTC
On May 15, 2002 04:49:44 am -0700, tg@FreeBSD.org wrote:
> Synopsis: Update: shells/pdksh (5.2.14.2)
> 
> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: tg
> State-Changed-When: Wed May 15 04:49:16 PDT 2002
> State-Changed-Why: 
> Committed, with minor changes. Thanks.
> 
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=38071

according to the following URL :

http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-pkgname.html 

your are wrong about the package naming. it should really be
pdksh-5.2.14.p2, eventually pdksh-5.2.14.2, but certainly not
pdksh-5.2.14p2. it you want to continue this way, you have to change
any occurance of ${PORTVERSION:M*p*:R} by ${PORTVERSION:M*p*:S/p/./:R},
else, you have to change PORTVERSION from 5.2.14p2 to 5.2.14.p2.

btw, only 19 packages follow the right rule while 43 don't follow it !

awk -F\| '{print $1}' /usr/ports/INDEX | grep '[0-9]p[0-9]' | wc
awk -F\| '{print $1}' /usr/ports/INDEX | grep '\.p[0-9]' | wc

PS : IMHO, the comma in the sed expression isn't necessary, but
this isn't important.

Cyrille.
-- 
Cyrille Lefevre                 mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net