Bug 89823 - [MAINTAINER] mail/bogofilter: update to 1.0.0
Summary: [MAINTAINER] mail/bogofilter: update to 1.0.0
Status: Closed FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: Normal Affects Only Me
Assignee: Emanuel Haupt
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-12-02 01:30 UTC by Matthias Andree
Modified: 2005-12-02 13:41 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments
bogofilter-1.0.0.patch (5.50 KB, patch)
2005-12-02 01:30 UTC, Matthias Andree
no flags Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Matthias Andree 2005-12-02 01:30:02 UTC
- Update to 1.0.0
- skip t.lock3 which is prone to run out of retries on busy machines
- revise pkg-descr

Removed file(s):
- files/patch-tests-nolocalconfig (merged upstream)

Generated with FreeBSD Port Tools 0.63
Comment 1 Emanuel Haupt freebsd_committer 2005-12-02 08:33:25 UTC
Responsible Changed
From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->ehaupt

Take.
Comment 2 Emanuel Haupt freebsd_committer 2005-12-02 08:37:20 UTC
is there a particular reason why "PORTREVISION?=	0" is set?

Emanuel
Comment 3 Emanuel Haupt freebsd_committer 2005-12-02 08:39:21 UTC
State Changed
From-To: open->feedback

Ask for maintainer feedback.
Comment 4 Matthias Andree 2005-12-02 11:55:11 UTC
Emanuel Haupt schrieb am 2005-12-02:

> is there a particular reason why "PORTREVISION?=	0" is set?

Slave ports may use a different portrevision and I wanted to document
the default. Now that you're asking it doesn't appear to be necessary.
I don't mind if it's removed if all slave ports also have version 1.0.0
afterwards. (slave ports are bogofilter-qdbm and bogofilter-sqlite).

-- 
Matthias Andree
Comment 5 Emanuel Haupt freebsd_committer 2005-12-02 13:41:49 UTC
State Changed
From-To: feedback->closed

Committed, thanks!