Bug 89951 - Fix breakage in security/fragroute
Summary: Fix breakage in security/fragroute
Status: Closed FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: Normal Affects Only Me
Assignee: Emanuel Haupt
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-12-04 23:30 UTC by Jonathan
Modified: 2005-12-05 12:36 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
fragroute-build.err (579 bytes, text/plain)
2005-12-04 23:30 UTC, Jonathan 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jonathan 2005-12-04 23:30:02 UTC 
Build failed today with this:

cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include    -O -pipe -march=pentium4m -Wall -c pcaputil.c
pcaputil.c: In function `pcap_open':
pcaputil.c:46: error: `BIOCIMMEDIATE' undeclared (first use in this function)
pcaputil.c:46: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
pcaputil.c:46: error: for each function it appears in.)

It's the same issue as I had in security/firewalk, so it's the same fix.

How-To-Repeat: cd /usr/ports/security/fragroute && make
Comment 1 Emanuel Haupt freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2005-12-05 09:10:47 UTC 
Responsible Changed
From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->ehaupt

Take.
Comment 2 Emanuel Haupt freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2005-12-05 09:24:36 UTC 
I couldn't reproduce the buildlog on a current 6.0-STABLE machine. There
is also no indication from pointyhat.freebsd.org that the port is
broken. I saw you're using 6.0-BETA4 and you're using
'-march=pentium4m'. Does the port break without '-march=pentium4m'?

Regards,
Emanuel

-- 
GnuPG key id: 0x55E67774         Download: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371
Key fingerprint: 17B3 FD8F BA68 4AB4 10FD  A9D1 AD52 6588 55E6 7774
Comment 3 Emanuel Haupt freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2005-12-05 09:26:39 UTC 
State Changed
From-To: open->feedback

Ask for maintainer feedback.
Comment 4 onatan 2005-12-05 10:44:54 UTC 
On 12/5/05, Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@freebsd.org> wrote:
> I couldn't reproduce the buildlog on a current 6.0-STABLE machine. There
> is also no indication from pointyhat.freebsd.org that the port is
> broken. I saw you're using 6.0-BETA4 and you're using
> '-march=3Dpentium4m'. Does the port break without '-march=3Dpentium4m'?

It was reproduced on my laptop, with 6.0-STABLE (the BETA4 is just the
server I send-pr
from).
It's the same issue that was reported in ports/86132.
I'm seeing it in security/dsniff too, so it's probably relevant to the
recent libnet changes.
Comment 5 Emanuel Haupt freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2005-12-05 12:05:13 UTC 
> It was reproduced on my laptop, with 6.0-STABLE (the BETA4 is just the
> server I send-pr
> from).
> It's the same issue that was reported in ports/86132.
> I'm seeing it in security/dsniff too, so it's probably relevant to the
> recent libnet changes.

Thanks for clarifying. Would you like to take maintainership of this
port?

-- 
GnuPG key id: 0x55E67774         Download: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371
Key fingerprint: 17B3 FD8F BA68 4AB4 10FD  A9D1 AD52 6588 55E6 7774
Comment 6 onatan 2005-12-05 12:08:34 UTC 
> Thanks for clarifying. Would you like to take maintainership of this
> port?

sure.
Comment 7 Emanuel Haupt freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2005-12-05 12:36:23 UTC 
State Changed
From-To: feedback->closed

Committed, thanks!