In Message-ID: <CFF39396-9FF9-4B9B-BC37-DE54CB0364E5@freebsd.org> Ade Lovett <ade@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Mar 27, 2006, at 14:03 , NAKATA Maho wrote: > > > Hello ade, > > a patch for gmake has been submitted. Could you please invesitvate > > this? > > patch is merely using hash rather than directly using malloc. > > I think it is safe...and we don't need devel/gmake-devel any more. > > I'm waiting for an updated version of the patch that conforms to the > guidelines laid out in the Porters Handbook. Once that's been taken > care of, it will get scheduled for an -exp build run at some > convenient time. Thanks for your reply. I reviwed gmake.diff by Robert Muir again but I don't see a problem(it does bump portrevision correctly and merely adding patches). Could you please where is the point which violate the guidebook? All the best, -- NAKATA, Maho (maho@FreeBSD.org)
State Changed From-To: open->closed I can't figure out which base PR this was supposed to apply to. Close it but assign it to ade@ so followups wind up somewhere useful.
Responsible Changed From-To: gnats-admin->ade http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=95095 Adding to audit trail: This apparently applies to ports/94526.
Just for tracking purposes, the PR containing the patch which will be set up for an -exp run is 94526. As and when 5.5/6.1 RELEASEs are out the door, I'll co-ordinate with portmgr@ on getting the run done. -aDe