From <https://forums.freebsd.org/posts/561637> (sorry, I know that this will wrap and appear wrong in Bugzilla): % lsblk da4 DEVICE MAJ:MIN SIZE TYPE LABEL MOUNT da4 0:189 3.7G GPT - - <FREE> -:- 47K - - - da4p1 0:190 3.7G ms-basic-data gpt/Basic /media/Verbatim_STORE_N_GO_070B29D2DF235960_p1 <FREE> -:- 1.5M - - - %
Hi, can you show me output of these commands for da4? # gpart show -p # gpart show -p -r # gpart show -p -l Thanks.
(In reply to Slawomir Wojciech Wojtczak from comment #1) % gpart show -p da4 => 34 7814237 da4 GPT (3.7G) 34 94 - free - (47K) 128 7811072 da4p1 ms-basic-data (3.7G) 7811200 3071 - free - (1.5M) % gpart show -p -r da4 => 34 7814237 da4 GPT (3.7G) 34 94 - free - (47K) 128 7811072 da4p1 ebd0a0a2-b9e5-4433-87c0-68b6b72699c7 (3.7G) 7811200 3071 - free - (1.5M) % gpart show -p -l da4 => 34 7814237 da4 GPT (3.7G) 34 94 - free - (47K) 128 7811072 da4p1 Basic data partition (3.7G) 7811200 3071 - free - (1.5M) %
Thank you. Can you also send me that output? # sh -x /usr/local/sbin/lsblk da4
Does that fix work?
(In reply to Slawomir Wojciech Wojtczak from comment #4) Sorry for the pause … I might test at the weekend. Thanks.
Well? Did it helped? :)
Created attachment 238911 [details] sh -x /usr/local/sbin/lsblk da3 (In reply to Slawomir Wojciech Wojtczak from comment #3) Attached: output from sh -x /usr/local/sbin/lsblk da3 whilst its file system at partition 1 was mounted.
(In reply to Graham Perrin from comment #7) I assume that this is the wanted output? % lsblk da3 DEVICE MAJ:MIN SIZE TYPE LABEL MOUNT da3 2:57 3.7G GPT - - <FREE> -:- 47K - - - da3p1 2:58 3.7G ms-basic-data gpt/Basic data partition /media/Verbatim_STORE_N_GO_070B29D2DF235960_p1 <FREE> -:- 1.5M - - - ... while current output is like that? % lsblk da3 DEVICE MAJ:MIN SIZE TYPE LABEL MOUNT da3 2:57 3.7G GPT - - <FREE> -:- 47K - - - da3p1 2:58 3.7G ms-basic-data gpt/Basic /media/Verbatim_STORE_N_GO_070B29D2DF235960_p1 <FREE> -:- 1.5M - - - Regards.
Created attachment 239074 [details] Comment 8 (too wide for Bugzilla), as an attachment (In reply to Slawomir Wojciech Wojtczak from comment #8) Looks good to me, thanks.
What is the status of this issue?
(In reply to Yuri Victorovich from comment #10) Graham Perrin wrote before Your comment that "Looks good to me, thanks." - and my stance is the same. Regards, vermaden