Bug 193549
| Summary: | graphics/dcraw-m UNbreak this port MASTER_SITES | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Chris Hutchinson <portmaster> | ||||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | freebsd-ports-bugs (Nobody) <ports-bugs> | ||||||
| Status: | Closed Overcome By Events | ||||||||
| Severity: | Affects Many People | CC: | marino, portmaster | ||||||
| Priority: | --- | ||||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
(In reply to C Hutchinson from comment #0) > Created attachment 147208 [details] > graphics/dcraw-m UN break the port > > graphics/dcraw-m > > I use this port, and had already had the source. > I'm happy to host it. So here's a diff that should restore it. > > replaces MASTER_SITES > changes distinfo > > FWIW Feel free to put me as MAINTAINER, should the current one > be un(willing|able) > > Thank you for all your time, and consideration. > > --Chris P.S. Should probably also mention; did NOT bump PORTREVISION It seems the distfile was rerolled, why? this is bad practice. (In reply to Antoine Brodin from comment #2) > It seems the distfile was rerolled, why? this is bad practice. Sure. But since I'm the new source for the port, and given it's otherwise being broken. This effectively makes it a new port. Does re-rolling it really matter? Maybe a "port" revision bump is needed? Thanks for all your time, and consideration. --Chris Yes, it matters. The port is getting removed in less than a month too. If you care, bump the PORTREVISION and explain what the changes were. How else are you going to convince people this is not a tampered-with distfile? Created attachment 148958 [details]
make fetchable, repack, bump PORTREVISION
Here is a revised version (replaces previous) that takes into
account for all the comments the first diff(1) generated;
* repacked source to remain consistent with the other
source I host (the original source remains UNCHANGED)
which necessitates PORTREVISION bump
* UNbreak port (it now becomes fetchable)
Hope this addresses all the currently outstanding issues. :)
--Chris
(In reply to C Hutchinson from comment #5) > Created attachment 148958 [details] > make fetchable, repack, bump PORTREVISION > > Here is a revised version (replaces previous) that takes into > account for all the comments the first diff(1) generated; > > * repacked source to remain consistent with the other > source I host (the original source remains UNCHANGED) > which necessitates PORTREVISION bump > > * UNbreak port (it now becomes fetchable) > > Hope this addresses all the currently outstanding issues. :) > > --Chris All of this is now moot. Maintainer opened a new pr(1): https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194775 Please mark this closed. --Chris withdrawn |
Created attachment 147208 [details] graphics/dcraw-m UN break the port graphics/dcraw-m I use this port, and had already had the source. I'm happy to host it. So here's a diff that should restore it. replaces MASTER_SITES changes distinfo FWIW Feel free to put me as MAINTAINER, should the current one be un(willing|able) Thank you for all your time, and consideration. --Chris