Bug 199866
| Summary: | [MAINTAINER-UPDATE] dns/knot: update on 1.6.3 - LibreSSL and GOST | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Leo Vandewoestijne <freebsd> | ||||||||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | freebsd-ports-bugs (Nobody) <ports-bugs> | ||||||||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||||||||
| Severity: | Affects Some People | CC: | erwin | ||||||||||
| Priority: | --- | ||||||||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||
Created attachment 156242 [details]
portlint -AC output
Created attachment 156243 [details]
poudriere 9.3
Created attachment 156244 [details]
poudriere log for 10.1
> Now Knot 2.0.0-beta isn't ready to replace knot 1.6 yet, but at one point it will.
> Is it smart to add the PKGNAMESUFFIX=16 ..?
I would suggest to do it the other way around for as long as the knot 1.x series is the recommended version, and have that be called knot (both in PKGNAME and in dns/knot) and thus have the new beta port as dns/knot2 and knot2 as name suffix. This can be moved around when 2.x becomes the default version.
Aha, yes, that's what I wanted to achieve, as in deed the 1.6 needs to remain the default for now. (So as you suggested only Knot DNS version 2 should have PKGNAMESUFFIX=2) A commit references this bug: Author: erwin Date: Mon May 18 11:21:07 UTC 2015 New revision: 386670 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/386670 Log: The upstream came with a different temporarily solution than the patch in PR 199298. This one allows for GOST in DNSSEC. Add conflict with upcoming knot2 port. PR: 199866 Submitted by: Leo Vandewoestijne <freebsd@dns-lab.com> (maintainer) Changes: head/dns/knot/Makefile head/dns/knot/files/patch-src_libknot_dnssec_config.h head/dns/knot/files/patch-src_libknot_dnssec_crypto.c Committed, thanks! |
Created attachment 156241 [details] update patch - with GOST enabled The upstream came with a different temporarily solution than the patch in PR 199298. This one allows for GOST in DNSSEC. I've tested it and it works fine. Further Knot2 has been published. It will coexist for an unknown while. It's changed a lot. And I have the port ready. Now Knot 2.0.0-beta isn't ready to replace knot 1.6 yet, but at one point it will. Is it smart to add the PKGNAMESUFFIX=16 ..?