Bug 203903
| Summary: | [NEW PORT] devel/maven: Java project management tool (3.3.x) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Mark Dixon <mnd999> | ||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | freebsd-ports-bugs (Nobody) <ports-bugs> | ||||
| Status: | Closed DUPLICATE | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | bruce, pi | ||||
| Priority: | --- | Keywords: | feature, needs-qa, patch | ||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| See Also: | https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188110 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
Somehow, we have plenty of suggested ports, but not the courage to say: That's the right way to do it. This version has
INSTANCE_FILE= 030101-${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}
while the latest version in
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188110
has
030303-${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}
Can somebody explain the difference to me ?
And: There are differences in the startup-scripts provided.
Can we find a common ground ?
I think we move this discussion to the other bug and focus on getting a single devel/maven To reply to your comment, the INSTANCE file looks like something I missed when copying the maven31 port. I'd have to look at the other startup script. As suggested by submitter, we move the discussion to 188110 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 188110 *** |
Created attachment 162261 [details] Shar for maven33 Create a port for Maven 3.3, based (heavily) on the Maven 3.1 port.