Summary: | [PATCH] java/openjdk8: Use late in pkg-message's fstab entries | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Tobias Kortkamp <tobik> | ||||
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | freebsd-java (Nobody) <java> | ||||
Status: | Closed Works As Intended | ||||||
Severity: | Affects Some People | CC: | ehaupt, iamasmith.home, jkim | ||||
Priority: | --- | Keywords: | patch | ||||
Version: | Latest | Flags: | bugzilla:
maintainer-feedback?
(java) |
||||
Hardware: | Any | ||||||
OS: | Any | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Tobias Kortkamp
![]() ![]() These are almost direct copy-and-paste from fdescfs(5) and procfs(5). https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=fdescfs&manpath=FreeBSD+10.2-RELEASE https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=procfs&manpath=FreeBSD+10.2-RELEASE I don't see any reason to change the message. :-/ (In reply to Jung-uk Kim from comment #1) I'm not sure if you missed the significance of the 'late' flag and the very good response to the post on the forum. It sounds like a simple update to the mount option suggestions, either this or a note about the particular issue experienced by the op on the thread could save people a lot of fishing around for an answer. (In reply to Andrew Smith from comment #2) > could save people a lot of fishing around for an answer Yes, that was the reason for opening this PR. (In reply to Jung-uk Kim from comment #1) > These are almost direct copy-and-paste from fdescfs(5) and procfs(5). So you're saying that fdescfs(5) and procfs(5) need an update too? ;-) If nobody wants this please reject it and let's close this PR. Don't leave it hanging around forever. I consider > 6 months too long for stuff like this. The cost of changing it is so low. It's not like changing a pkg message will break any functionality. |