Summary: | [NEW PORT] sysutils/rundeck3: Web-console for dispatching commands and scripts to your nodes | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Daniel Tihanyi <daniel.tihanyi> | ||||||||
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Hiroki Tagato <tagattie> | ||||||||
Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||||||
Severity: | Affects Some People | CC: | arcade, daniel.tihanyi, tagattie | ||||||||
Priority: | --- | ||||||||||
Version: | Latest | ||||||||||
Hardware: | Any | ||||||||||
OS: | Any | ||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Daniel Tihanyi
2020-04-29 10:46:55 UTC
(In reply to Daniel Tihanyi from comment #0) This is the correct bug for renaming the port: bug 246022 Hi Daniel, Thanks for proposing this port. Since this is not a totally new port but a new version of existing port sysutils/rundeck, can you prepare a diff file against the latest sysutils/rundeck directory? The MAINTAINER is specified as "arcade@b1t.name" not you. Is this OK for him/her to maintain this port as well as rundeck2? Created attachment 214111 [details]
rundeck-rundeck3-diff
Hello Hiroki,
I'm not entirely sure how maintainership works, that's why I left as it is. I am happy maintain rundeck3 (also rundeck2 if needed).
I attached a diff that will remove the current sysutils/rundeck port and add sysutils/rundeck3 (still with old maintainer).
(In reply to Daniel Tihanyi from comment #3) I may have been a big vague when asking you to make a diff file. I would like it to be a diff between rundeck2 and rundeck3 in the same sysutils/rundeck directory. Can you update the diff again? Regarding maintainer, let's ask Volodymyr. Volodymyr, do you feel comfortable about being the maintainer of the new sysutils/rundeck3, which is proposed by Daniel? If not, I will pass maintainership to Daniel. Hello. I guess Daniel already volunteered to maintain the port so why not? Actually I'm happy to give away rundeck2 also - we moved all hosts to Linux so I kindda lost the need in it. It's a legacy version so not much updates there. I only suggested to leave rundeck2 in ports as we (as a company) still have an ongoing effort to upgrade to rundeck3 and it's not going out nicely... @Daniel. welcome to the club, buddy. I'm not a pro at maintaining/creating ports, but that shouldn't be that hard. I think I even ripped most of the rundeck port from some other java port. Everything will work the same way: you are adding a bug, attaching diff, someone with a commit bit chimes in and commits it. If you need help - just say it out loud. There are mailing lists, groups at matrix, at telegram, irc, almost everywhere. Cheers! (In reply to Volodymyr Kostyrko from comment #5) Thanks Volodymyr for your reply and efforts put into maintaining the port. Daniel, can you update the diff file with MAINTAINER set to yourself? I will set the maitainer of sysutils/rundeck2 port to you as well. I look forward to the updated patch. Created attachment 214199 [details]
rundeck diff to rundeck3
@Hiroki: I attached a new diff, I hope this time it's correct.
@Volodymyr: Thank you, I will do my best. :-)
A commit references this bug: Author: tagattie Date: Thu May 7 11:10:41 UTC 2020 New revision: 534258 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/534258 Log: There is rundeck version 3 available and version 2 is still supported. So it is good to have both versions in the ports. This commit is to: - Add rundeck ver. 3 as rundeck3 - Preserve rundeck ver. 2 as rundeck2 for users who want to stay in version 2 - Pass maintainership to submitter PR: 246022 246023 Submitted by: Daniel Tihanyi <daniel.tihanyi@tetragir.com> Approved by: arcade@b1t.name (maintainer), pizzamig (mentor) Changes: head/MOVED head/sysutils/Makefile head/sysutils/rundeck/ head/sysutils/rundeck2/ head/sysutils/rundeck2/Makefile head/sysutils/rundeck2/pkg-plist head/sysutils/rundeck3/ head/sysutils/rundeck3/Makefile head/sysutils/rundeck3/distinfo head/sysutils/rundeck3/files/rundeck.in head/sysutils/rundeck3/pkg-plist Committed, thanks! |