Summary: | sysutils/ipmitool: Fix lan print and FRU editing | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Olivier Cochard <olivier> | ||||
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Ryan Steinmetz <zi> | ||||
Status: | New --- | ||||||
Severity: | Affects Only Me | Flags: | bugzilla:
maintainer-feedback?
(zi) |
||||
Priority: | --- | ||||||
Version: | Latest | ||||||
Hardware: | Any | ||||||
OS: | Any | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Olivier Cochard
2024-11-07 23:28:02 UTC
Missing details/patches? Created attachment 255018 [details]
patch
Without this patch: % ipmitool -I lanplus -H 1.1.1.8 -U user -P pass lan print 1 && echo WORKING || echo FAILING Set in Progress : Set Complete Auth Type Support : Auth Type Enable : Callback : : User : : Operator : : Admin : : OEM : IP Address Source : Static Address IP Address : 1.1.1.8 Subnet Mask : 255.255.254.0 MAC Address : a0:42:36:46:66:66 FAILING --------------------------------------------- With this path: % ipmitool -I lanplus -H 1.1.1.8 -U user -P pass lan print 1 && echo WORKING || echo FAILING Set in Progress : Set Complete Auth Type Support : Auth Type Enable : Callback : : User : : Operator : : Admin : : OEM : IP Address Source : Static Address IP Address : 1.1.1.8 Subnet Mask : 255.255.254.0 MAC Address : a0:42:36:46:66:66 Default Gateway IP : 1.1.1.1 Default Gateway MAC : 00:00:00:00:00:00 802.1q VLAN ID : Disabled RMCP+ Cipher Suites : 17 Cipher Suite Priv Max : aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa : X=Cipher Suite Unused : c=CALLBACK : u=USER : o=OPERATOR : a=ADMIN : O=OEM Bad Password Threshold : Not Available WORKING I don't believe upstream has accepted/adopted these--at least the second one, which looks like a dup of #282274. Can you try to poke them or see if they can review? (In reply to Ryan Steinmetz from comment #4) Looks like the Pull-Request on github are ignored: the list start to be long. https://github.com/ipmitool/ipmitool/pulls (In reply to Olivier Cochard from comment #5) Yeah, someone just recently submitted the same commit to the 'new' git instance for the project (https://codeberg.org/IPMITool/ipmitool/pulls/50). Want to poke the devs on it? (In reply to Ryan Steinmetz from comment #6) I hope the developer is already aware of all the open pull requests on GitHub and Codeberg. Needing to follow up by email to address such a critical issue isn’t an encouraging sign. |