Applying 2 existing Pull-Request from upstream.
Missing details/patches?
Created attachment 255018 [details] patch
Without this patch: % ipmitool -I lanplus -H 1.1.1.8 -U user -P pass lan print 1 && echo WORKING || echo FAILING Set in Progress : Set Complete Auth Type Support : Auth Type Enable : Callback : : User : : Operator : : Admin : : OEM : IP Address Source : Static Address IP Address : 1.1.1.8 Subnet Mask : 255.255.254.0 MAC Address : a0:42:36:46:66:66 FAILING --------------------------------------------- With this path: % ipmitool -I lanplus -H 1.1.1.8 -U user -P pass lan print 1 && echo WORKING || echo FAILING Set in Progress : Set Complete Auth Type Support : Auth Type Enable : Callback : : User : : Operator : : Admin : : OEM : IP Address Source : Static Address IP Address : 1.1.1.8 Subnet Mask : 255.255.254.0 MAC Address : a0:42:36:46:66:66 Default Gateway IP : 1.1.1.1 Default Gateway MAC : 00:00:00:00:00:00 802.1q VLAN ID : Disabled RMCP+ Cipher Suites : 17 Cipher Suite Priv Max : aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa : X=Cipher Suite Unused : c=CALLBACK : u=USER : o=OPERATOR : a=ADMIN : O=OEM Bad Password Threshold : Not Available WORKING
I don't believe upstream has accepted/adopted these--at least the second one, which looks like a dup of #282274. Can you try to poke them or see if they can review?
(In reply to Ryan Steinmetz from comment #4) Looks like the Pull-Request on github are ignored: the list start to be long. https://github.com/ipmitool/ipmitool/pulls
(In reply to Olivier Cochard from comment #5) Yeah, someone just recently submitted the same commit to the 'new' git instance for the project (https://codeberg.org/IPMITool/ipmitool/pulls/50). Want to poke the devs on it?
(In reply to Ryan Steinmetz from comment #6) I hope the developer is already aware of all the open pull requests on GitHub and Codeberg. Needing to follow up by email to address such a critical issue isn’t an encouraging sign.