A patch to make the security chapter more consistent regarding the use of acronyms etc. I've added a number of <acronym></acronym> tags, as well as a couple of <acronym role=""></acronym> tags along with some small fixes (i.e. using entities instead of -- and such). As I was doing this I realized two things, firstly, should I use the <acronym role=""></acronym> on every single acronym, or just <acronym></acronym>, or should I leave most of the acronyms alone altogether? The second thing is, do we need an overhaul like this on the entire handbook? Fix: Apply the following patch, or the parts you find fitting. I'm happy to rewrite the patch if there is need, just let me know. Patch attached with submission follows: How-To-Repeat: Uhm, It's not really a problem...
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-doc->keramida I'll take care of this.
Responsible Changed From-To: keramida->trhodes Steal from Giorgos.
For bugs matching the following criteria: Status: In Progress Changed: (is less than) 2014-06-01 Reset to default assignee and clear in-progress tags. Mail being skipped
Keyword: patch or patch-ready – in lieu of summary line prefix: [patch] * bulk change for the keyword * summary lines may be edited manually (not in bulk). Keyword descriptions and search interface: <https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/describekeywords.cgi>
(In reply to Niclas Zeising from comment #0) > … I'm happy to rewrite the patch if there is need, just let me know. … During the fifteen years (ahem) since your patch was offered (thank you), we have the change of path; the migration to AsciiDoctor; plus I can't guess how many other changes in, or involving, the chapter. zeising@ I'll leave it for you to decide whether to rewrite, or close, in the context of FreeBSD Handbook revamp tracking bug 263315 …
I'm gonna close this PR as overcome by events. We upgraded the chapter in this commit: https://cgit.freebsd.org/doc/commit/?id=99333306