usr.sbin/makefs/ffs/ffs_bswap.c

CID 974635 : Destination buffer too small (BUFFER_SIZE)
  10. buffer_size: You might overrun the 48 byte destination
  string n->di_db by writing the maximum 60 bytes from o->di_db.

138        memcpy(n->di_db, o->di_db, (NDADDR + NIADDR) * sizeof(u_int32_t));

CID 974636 : Destination buffer too small (BUFFER_SIZE)
  20. buffer_size: You might overrun the 16 byte destination string
  n->di_extb by writing the maximum 136 bytes from o->di_extb.

168        memcpy(n->di_extb, o->di_extb, (NXADDR + NDADDR + NIADDR) * 8);

--------------- Source analysis:

sys/ufs/ufs/dinode.h defines

  typedef int32_t ufs1_daddr_t;
  ...
  struct ufs1_dinode {
          ...
          ufs1_daddr_t di_db[NDADDR]; /* 40: Direct disk blocks. */
          ufs1_daddr_t di_ib[NIADDR]; /* 88: Indirect disk blocks. */
          ...

So both arrays get copied in one memcpy() operation.

Same with CID 974636:

  typedef int64_t ufs2_daddr_t;
  ...
  struct ufs2_dinode {
          ...
          ufs2_daddr_t di_extb[NXADDR];/* 96: External attributes block. */
          ufs2_daddr_t di_db[NDADDR]; /* 112: Direct disk blocks. */
          ufs2_daddr_t di_ib[NIADDR]; /* 208: Indirect disk blocks. */

Three arrays, one memcpy().

--------------- Remedy proposal:

One should consider to use two or three separate memcpy() calls.
(I cannot judge whether the alignment of 40 and 88 needs
 padding bytes on any architecture.)