Bug 210987 - math/libR maintainer: Convert to standalone port, Mark Un'BROKEN
Summary: math/libR maintainer: Convert to standalone port, Mark Un'BROKEN
Status: Closed Overcome By Events
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: --- Affects Only Me
Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs mailing list
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2016-07-10 20:27 UTC by Joseph Mingrone
Modified: 2016-10-17 21:54 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
koobs: merge-quarterly?


Attachments
svn patch for math/libR (7.51 KB, patch)
2016-07-10 20:27 UTC, Joseph Mingrone
jrm: maintainer-approval+
Details | Diff
svn diff to fix math/libR (7.54 KB, patch)
2016-07-10 21:37 UTC, Joseph Mingrone
jrm: maintainer-approval+
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Joseph Mingrone freebsd_committer 2016-07-10 20:27:57 UTC
Created attachment 172357 [details]
svn patch for math/libR

portlint: OK
testport: OK (poudriere: 9.3-RELEASE-p36, i386,  default options)
testport: OK (poudriere: 9.3-RELEASE-p30, amd64, default options)
testport: OK (poudriere: 10.3-RELEASE,    i386,  default options)
testport: OK (poudriere: 10.3-RELEASE,    amd64, default options)

I also tested a variety of option combinations and all built without error.  However, math/atlas cannot be chosen as the BLAS implementation in poudriere, because it must be built on the target hardware for optimization.  This is handled somewhat gracefully with

ATLAS_VARS= MANUAL_PACKAGE_BUILD=...

This applies to math/R as well.  See http://math-atlas.sourceforge.net/atlas_install/node27.html.
Comment 1 Joseph Mingrone freebsd_committer 2016-07-10 21:37:52 UTC
Created attachment 172359 [details]
svn diff to fix math/libR

Same as the last patch, but with the line below.
ATLAS_USES=		blaslapack:atlas
Comment 2 VK freebsd_triage 2016-10-17 21:45:57 UTC
The math/libR port has been deleted from the tree.

https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=424082

As I don't fully understand this and the related math/libRmath request to separate it from math/R, and the port deletion was done by the reporter, I'm going to ask if this is okay to close first?

Ok to close?
Comment 3 Joseph Mingrone freebsd_committer 2016-10-17 21:54:54 UTC
After further discussion, it seemed to appropriate action was to remove the port.  So, yes, this can be closed.

Thanks.