Created attachment 173429 [details] Patch containing declaration of machmgr_toggle_tag_all() function I use net/omnitty a fair bit, often with fairly large lists of machines. I often need to do "something" to about half the machines, then do "something else" to the other half. So I came up with a hack to toggle the "tagged" status of the machines. This is implemented by means of the F1 menu; I added the command characters "o" and "O" for this purpose. (I was going to use "x" and "X", but "X" is already in use. If someone else has a better/more mnemonic code letters to use... well, I'm in favor!) Anyway, drop the attached patchfiles into the files/ subdirectory, then make the port as usual. I went ahead and separated the patchfiles, as I understand that it's traditional to have a separate patchfile for each port file that's being patched, even though they collectively implement a single function.
Created attachment 173430 [details] Patch containing machmgr_toggle_tag_all() function I don't seem to be able to create a PR with multiple attachments. :-/
Created attachment 173431 [details] Patch containing code to invoke machmgr_toggle_tag_all() function
A commit references this bug: Author: tobik Date: Thu Aug 9 12:25:09 UTC 2018 New revision: 476742 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/476742 Log: net/omnitty: Add abililty to "toggle" tagged machines We often need to do "something" to about half the machines, then do "something else" to the other half. So add a hack to toggle the "tagged" status of the machines. This is implemented by means of the F1 menu; the command characters "o" and "O" can toggle the "tagged" status of the machines. PR: 211682 Submitted by: maintainer Changes: head/net/omnitty/Makefile head/net/omnitty/files/patch-machmgr.c head/net/omnitty/files/patch-machmgr.h head/net/omnitty/files/patch-main.c head/net/omnitty/files/patch-menu.c
Finally committed. Thanks! This was really annoying to apply. Having to download and move individual patch files is no fun. I did this out of good will now since the bug is already 2 years old, but please provide a single diff generated with `svn diff` that we can apply against the port with `svn patch` in the future.