Bug 215706 - [NEW PORT] shells/mudsh: a game-like shell, brought back from the archives
Summary: [NEW PORT] shells/mudsh: a game-like shell, brought back from the archives
Status: Open
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: --- Affects Some People
Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs (Nobody)
URL: https://web.archive.org/web/200408310...
Keywords: needs-qa, patch
Depends on:
Reported: 2017-01-02 01:50 UTC by Vidar Karlsen
Modified: 2020-06-19 22:49 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:

shar file for shells/mudsh (2.07 KB, text/plain)
2017-01-02 01:50 UTC, Vidar Karlsen
no flags Details
shar file for shells/mudsh (2.07 KB, text/plain)
2017-03-09 19:26 UTC, Vidar Karlsen
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Vidar Karlsen 2017-01-02 01:50:11 UTC
Created attachment 178440 [details]
shar file for shells/mudsh

A MUD based shell, rescued from the pages of time. The original hosting site,
xirium.com, seems to be dead since ~2008.

Is there any reason why a shell (or command line) cannot be as tolerant or as
intelligent as a text adventure game like Zork, or a MUD [Multi User Dungeon]?
Is there any reason why a shell cannot work like such a game? ("Go North",
etc.) Actually, no and we have the implementation to prove it. Have fun, and
don't get eaten by a Grue!

WWW: https://web.archive.org/web/20040831083346/http://www.xirium.com/tech/mud-shell/download/
Comment 1 Vidar Karlsen 2017-03-09 19:26:30 UTC
Created attachment 180679 [details]
shar file for shells/mudsh

Version bump
Comment 2 Nathan 2018-08-21 17:07:57 UTC
Submitter still wanting this added?  Also why use archive.org for www and not just use GitHub page url?
Comment 3 Vidar Karlsen 2018-08-25 15:00:25 UTC
(In reply to Nathan from comment #2)
I used the archive.org URL for historical reasons. The GitHub README links to that as well, so either way works for me.
Comment 4 Lorenzo Salvadore freebsd_committer 2020-06-19 22:47:20 UTC

- Please set the maintainer-approval attachment flag (to +) on patches for ports you maintain (including new ports) to signify approval.

Attachment -> Details -> maintainer-approval [+]

- If your PR is related to an URL, please put it in the URL field.

I am sorry this new port is taking so long to be committed. I hope you have not lost interest in the port in the meantime: hopefully triaging will help getting the proper attention to this PR.
By the way, some committers search for contributors' patches to commit by seeking maintainer approval flags set to +: that's why it is important to not forget about them.
Comment 5 Lorenzo Salvadore freebsd_committer 2020-06-19 22:49:33 UTC
^Triage: Please confirm this change passes QA (portlint, poudriere at least). 

For details and instructions, see: