Bug 225342 - lang/luajit: Update to 2.1.0-beta3
Summary: lang/luajit: Update to 2.1.0-beta3
Status: New
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: --- Affects Only Me
Assignee: Sergey A. Osokin
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on: 226537 226541
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2018-01-20 18:19 UTC by Greg V
Modified: 2020-12-02 08:42 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
bugzilla: maintainer-feedback? (osa)

Attachments
luajit-2.1.beta3.patch (3.04 KB, patch)
2018-01-20 18:19 UTC, Greg V 		no flags Details | Diff
luajit-2.1.beta3.patch v2 (10.87 KB, patch)
2018-03-11 23:11 UTC, Greg V 		no flags Details | Diff
luajit-2.1.beta3.patch (13.65 KB, patch)
2018-08-07 16:50 UTC, Greg V 		no flags Details | Diff
patch (8.84 KB, patch)
2020-03-07 08:09 UTC, Mikael Urankar 		no flags Details | Diff
Show Obsolete (3) View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Greg V 2018-01-20 18:19:24 UTC 
Created attachment 189934 [details]
luajit-2.1.beta3.patch

You might want to wait for 2.1.0 final release, but just throwing this out there — it works on arm64!
Comment 1 Sergey A. Osokin freebsd_committer 2018-01-20 19:03:01 UTC 
Hi Greg,

thanks for the report.

At first look the patch looks incomplete: PORTREVISION should be removed.

Also, several ports depend on lang/luajit and should be updated with this change, this is why I've recommended to garga@ to raise a review in Phabricator.
Comment 2 Greg V 2018-01-21 12:26:06 UTC 
benchmarks/wrk was fixed upstream: https://github.com/wg/wrk/issues/314 asked them for a release.

editors/neovim fixed a non-fatal error, not related to the update but to arm64: https://github.com/neovim/neovim/issues/7879

Apparently "it doesn't seem like a final release [of LuaJIT 2.1] will be out anytime soon". Debian testing is shipping 2.1.0-beta3 already.
Comment 3 Walter Schwarzenfeld freebsd_triage 2018-03-11 19:27:53 UTC 
Could this included or is it out of time? bugs #191476.
Comment 4 Walter Schwarzenfeld freebsd_triage 2018-03-11 19:28:17 UTC 
bug #191476.
Comment 5 Greg V 2018-03-11 23:11:16 UTC 
Created attachment 191436 [details]
luajit-2.1.beta3.patch v2

(In reply to w.schwarzenfeld from comment #3)
I'm not sure what exactly you meant, but I've included that pthread patch in this update.

Plus fixes for dependent ports. I think most of them should work now…
Comment 6 Sergey A. Osokin freebsd_committer 2018-04-21 05:00:04 UTC 
Looks very good for me.
Comment 7 Greg V 2018-08-07 16:50:41 UTC 
Created attachment 195982 [details]
luajit-2.1.beta3.patch

Updated with fixes for more dependent ports.
Comment 8 Adam Weinberger freebsd_committer 2019-01-05 21:33:30 UTC 
What's the status here? It would be nice to see luajit get updated.
Comment 9 Mikael Urankar freebsd_committer 2020-02-03 18:04:31 UTC 
ping
Comment 10 Adam Weinberger freebsd_committer 2020-02-03 21:33:49 UTC 
Sergey, are you planning on committing this?
Comment 11 Sergey A. Osokin freebsd_committer 2020-02-10 21:11:36 UTC 
Thanks for the new patch.

Looks good for me.  There are several ports are involved in this update.  I believe we can test (do a build?) those propertly before we commit the change.
Comment 12 Mikael Urankar freebsd_committer 2020-03-07 08:09:12 UTC 
Created attachment 212216 [details]
patch

regen
Comment 13 Daniel Engberg freebsd_committer 2020-03-20 08:47:04 UTC 
Perhaps it would be worth looking at porting moonjit https://github.com/moonjit/moonjit or raptorjit https://github.com/raptorjit/raptorjit instead which seems to be much more active and make it default instead?
Comment 14 Greg V 2020-03-21 00:14:18 UTC 
(In reply to daniel.engberg.lists from comment #13)

Huh, moonjit is the integration fork I sent a PR to before it was called moonjit.
https://github.com/moonjit/moonjit/pull/1

I'm for moonjit then. Though my interest in this has significantly lowered since neovim gained support for normal lua.. (and I switched to another editor later anyway lol)
Comment 15 Adam Weinberger freebsd_committer 2020-03-21 19:25:51 UTC 
Greg and Daniel, I really appreciate your input here! You know far more about this than I do.

Do you have a feel for moonjit vs raptorjit?

Also, is there a substantive benefit to luajit over lua in neovim?
Comment 16 Greg V 2020-03-22 20:27:57 UTC 
(In reply to Adam Weinberger from comment #15)

Moon expands portability (powerpc64, s390x), Raptor destroys portability ("removing #ifdef features that are not required for Linux/x86-64 e.g. Windows support, 32-bit heap support, and non-x86 backends"). Raptor is not suitable for replacing an OS package of luajit, Moon is.
Comment 17 Mikael Urankar freebsd_committer 2020-11-17 16:07:31 UTC 
any progress on this?
Comment 18 Daniel Engberg freebsd_committer 2020-12-02 08:42:07 UTC 
moonjit is dead so I'd suggest that we should point everything to openresty fork.