Created attachment 203777 [details]
Shar archive for the new port
Elasticsearch6 has a port, but Elasticsearch7 is out now. I mostly copied from textproc/elasticsearch6 and made the obvious changes, so I might have missed something; although I did test it and it seems to work.
Is the maintainer-feedback flag never supposed to be used for new port proposals, then? I thought it would be reasonable to set it since email@example.com was listed as the maintainer for elasticsearch6.
Also, I noticed that when you chaged the title you took out the [patch] thing. According to https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/problem-reports/pr-writing.html I'm supposed to put that in the title if I have a patch. Is my patch bad? Did I submit it wrong?
(In reply to rlwestlund from comment #1)
Since new ports don't exist in the tree yet, they don't have a maintainer.
Also, feld@ was CC'd, so using the flag wasn't necessary, but it was an appropriate person to CC.
On [tags] in summaries, you're fine, the docs are out of date, our/my fault :)
You seem really interested in how things work and doing the right thing. I'm more than happy to go over a few cheetsheats with you to level up your contributions and provide clarity on the best way to submit issues. Either hit me up preferably on IRC (freenode: #freebsd-ports), or email me :)