My ThinkPad L560 running FreeBSD 12.3-STABLE r371380 did not boot abruptly. The output of boot1.efi was: >> FreeBSD EFI boot block Loader path: /boot/loader.efi Initializing modules: ZFS UFS Load Path: \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.EFI Load Device: PciRoot(0x0)/Pci(0x17,0x0)/Sata(0x0,0x0,0x0)/HD(1,GPT,31EB33B1-A814-11EB-9474-FC4596A9D2D8,0x28,0xC8000) BootCurrent: 001a BootOrder: 0001 0010 0011 0012 0013 001b 0017 0018 0019 001a[*] 001c Probing 11 block devices...not supported not supported not supported not supported not supported better not supported better better better better done ZFS found no pools UFS found 5 partitions Nothing more, laptop hangs. I could not boot from disk anymore. I use gmirror/gjournal, and gpart show gives => 40 500118112 mirror/gmnbsd GPT (238G) 40 819200 1 efi (400M) 819240 16777216 2 freebsd-swap (8.0G) 17596456 16777216 3 freebsd-swap (8.0G) 34373672 16777216 4 freebsd-swap (8.0G) 51150888 16777216 5 freebsd-swap (8.0G) 67928104 16777216 6 freebsd-swap (8.0G) 84705320 4194304 7 freebsd-ufs (2.0G) 88899624 25165824 8 freebsd-ufs (12G) 114065448 67108864 9 freebsd-ufs (32G) 181174312 318943840 10 freebsd-ufs (152G) Partitions p3-p6 are the gjournals for the ufs partitions p7-p10. The first "better" in the output of boot1.efi shows the problem: boot1 mistankenly thinks the gjournal partition p5 is an ufs partition and therfore tries to start loader.efi from this partition. boot1 fails because the check for ufs is done with a simple compare to FS_UFS_MAGIC and in a gjournal partition this data can be found. Of cource this is a rarely event, but I had a hit. It would be much safer when boot1.efi does a check for the partition type freebsd-ufs in the GPT, so done in gptboot.
Does using loader.efi instead of boot1.efi work? If not, patch uploaded on Bug 207940 "stand/efi/boot1: Add boot partition selection" allows you to choose which partition to boot from. Unfortunately, recording chosen boot partition is not implemented. If you try, choose one from latest 2 patches, one by Naomichi Nonaka, another by me. Mine is just a variant of Naomichi's one, and the difference is just "how partitions/ZFS pools to be shown?".