Created attachment 249939 [details] git diff to add BSD One Clause License to Mk/bsd.licenses.db.mk I have, and have run across a number of ports that utilize the BSD One Clause License. But it's absence among the other accepted BSD license variants seems odd to me. Let's include it. :) The patch attached to this pr(1) adds this license. Files affected: Mk/bsd.licenses.db.mk tl,dr; LICENSE_NAME_BSD1CLAUSE= BSD One Clause License LICENSE_GROUPS_BSD1CLAUSE= FSF OSI References: 1. https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-1-Clause.html 2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses 3. https://urchin.earth.li/~twic/The_Amazing_Disappearing_BSD_License.html 4. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/include/ifaddrs.h?revision=62606&view=markup 5. https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:BSD-1-Clause Thanks.
The patch is wrong, BSD1CLAUSE is not recognized by FSF
(In reply to Antoine Brodin from comment #1) The source is https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html
(In reply to Antoine Brodin from comment #1) > The patch is wrong, BSD1CLAUSE is not recognized by FSF Sorry. https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:BSD-1-Clause seemed to indicate otherwise. I'll fix it shortly. Thanks for the correction, Antoine. --Chris
(In reply to Chris Hutchinson from comment #3) And in their wiki, the text file is the one of the 0 clause..
Created attachment 249940 [details] git diff adding BSD One Clause (with correction regarding FSF) This patch addresses your correction (FSF removed). Thanks.
(In reply to Antoine Brodin from comment #4) > And in their wiki, the text file is the one of the 0 clause.. Good catch! That's why you're the boss and not me. ;) Thanks again! --Chris