Cleared up some minor grammer errors, added some additional information for port maintainers, and added a link to the send-pr webpage. Fix: Diff below: How-To-Repeat: See: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/port-upgrading.html
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-doc Misfiled PR.
Is there a reason this hasn't been committed? Do I need to make some changes?
On 2003.05.14 06:10:20 -0700, Eric Anderson wrote: > Is there a reason this hasn't been committed? Do I need to make some changes? I just looked through the patch and noticed a few things. It references the send-pr webinterface which has been disabled (due to abuse) so I don't think it is useful to add a link to it at this point. In The FreeBSD Documentation Project word list 'e-mail' is spelled 'email'. The latest update to the 'Writing FreeBSD Problem Reports' article uses '[maintainer update]' so for consitency I think it would be better tell the maintainer to use that here also. As to why it hasn't been committed / commented on I would say most likely just because there is a backlog of PR's and nobody has gotten around to look at it. -- Simon L. Nielsen
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-doc->brueffer I'll take a look at it
New patch attached.. Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > On 2003.05.14 06:10:20 -0700, Eric Anderson wrote: > > >> Is there a reason this hasn't been committed? Do I need to make some changes? > > > I just looked through the patch and noticed a few things. > > It references the send-pr webinterface which has been disabled (due to > abuse) so I don't think it is useful to add a link to it at this point. > > In The FreeBSD Documentation Project word list 'e-mail' is spelled > 'email'. > > The latest update to the 'Writing FreeBSD Problem Reports' article uses > '[maintainer update]' so for consitency I think it would be better tell > the maintainer to use that here also. > > As to why it hasn't been committed / commented on I would say most > likely just because there is a backlog of PR's and nobody has gotten > around to look at it. >
On 2003.05.14 10:42:35 -0500, Eric Anderson wrote: > New patch attached.. Looks good to me. -- Simon L. Nielsen
State Changed From-To: open->closed Slightly different patch than the one from the audit trail committed, thanks!