I'll be happy to take maintainership over this one. I removed the BROKEN notice on versions older than 3, as this was completely rewritten and I feel somewhat optimistic today. Please tell me if this is proves wrong. The patch to change the Makefile is also not required anymore, I hope the configure is doing the right magic, as I haven't tested it when PREFIX!=/usr/local How-To-Repeat: N/A
State Changed From-To: open->feedback AFAIK firewalk still depends from net/libnet-devel and net/libdnet. Last is broken for FreeBSD, because it do not support ipfw2. Any idea?
yes, firewalk depends on libnet-devel and libdnet. I don't know of any breakage with IPFW2. Would it be OK if we detect/warn about it in the Makefile?
On 2003-07-14 at 08:26 -0700, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > Synopsis: port update: security/firewalk 1.0 -> 5.0 > > AFAIK firewalk still depends from net/libnet-devel > and net/libdnet. Last is broken for FreeBSD, because > it do not support ipfw2. Any idea? FYI - I have submitted PRs to update net/libnet and net/libnet-devel to the latest versions: ports/54386 - update net/libnet to 1.1.0 ports/54421 - update net/libnet-devel to 1.1.1-RC-005 Since 1.1.0 is now a stable version, and since firewalk 5.0 needs at least that version, it may now depend on net/libnet (obviously, after committing 54386) instead of net/libnet-devel. As far as net/libdnet - yes, it is broken on 5.x. Nonetheless, it should be useable under 4.x. Sergei
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->osa I'll handle this.
State Changed From-To: feedback->closed Commited, thanks! (on submitters request)