Makefile PORTREVISION bumped BROKEN deleted OPTIONS added heuristic changed distinfo updated How-To-Repeat: n/a
This looks like no install-info will be executed when installing from package. This could be avoided by using the INFO-mechanism. Volker
State Changed From-To: open->closed Committed, thanks!
"Volker Stolz" <vs@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > This looks like no install-info will be executed when installing from > package. This could be avoided by using the INFO-mechanism. I did not understand what you mean ? I've just re-check everything, w/ or w/o packages, w/o any issue. Cyrille Lefevre. -- home: mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net
Am 15. Jun 2004 um 11:11 CEST schrieb Cyrille Lefevre: > "Volker Stolz" <vs@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > This looks like no install-info will be executed when installing from > > package. This could be avoided by using the INFO-mechanism. > > > I did not understand what you mean ? > I've just re-check everything, w/ or w/o packages, w/o any issue. You need to do "extended" checking, otherwise you won't notice: install-info will register the file in a central directory, so that if you just invoke "info", you'll find a new entry. If you don't call install-info, you won't find it there and have to specify the full path, e.g. info /path/too/foo.info If you use INFO, this will be done automatically, the section will be inferred from the .info-file. -- http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/stolz/ *** PGP *** S/MIME Neu! Ändern Sie den Anfangstag Ihrer Woche
"Volker Stolz" <stolz@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > Am 15. Jun 2004 um 11:11 CEST schrieb Cyrille Lefevre: > > "Volker Stolz" <vs@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > This looks like no install-info will be executed when installing from > > > package. This could be avoided by using the INFO-mechanism. > > > > I did not understand what you mean ? > > I've just re-check everything, w/ or w/o packages, w/o any issue. > > You need to do "extended" checking, otherwise you won't notice: > install-info will register the file in a central directory, so that if you > just invoke "info", you'll find a new entry. If you don't call install-info, > you won't find it there and have to specify the full path, e.g. > info /path/too/foo.info > > If you use INFO, this will be done automatically, the section will be > inferred from the .info-file. that's what I've done : .if defined(WITH_CVSBOOK_INFO) INFO= cvsbook INFODIR= ${PREFIX}/${INFO_PATH} INSTALL_INFO?= install-info .endif ... do-install: ... .if defined(WITH_CVSBOOK_INFO) @${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKSRC}/cvsbook.info* ${INFODIR} @${INSTALL_INFO} ${INFODIR}/cvsbook.info ${INFODIR}/dir .endif so, whatever you use "make install/deinstall" or "pkg_add/pkg_delete cvsbook-1.21_2", cvsbook.info is well registered/unregistered in all cases ! Cyrille Lefevre. -- home: mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net
Am 15. Jun 2004 um 12:51 CEST schrieb Cyrille Lefevre: > "Volker Stolz" <stolz@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > > Am 15. Jun 2004 um 11:11 CEST schrieb Cyrille Lefevre: > > > "Volker Stolz" <vs@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > > This looks like no install-info will be executed when installing from > > > > package. This could be avoided by using the INFO-mechanism. > > > > > > I did not understand what you mean ? > > > I've just re-check everything, w/ or w/o packages, w/o any issue. > > > > You need to do "extended" checking, otherwise you won't notice: > > install-info will register the file in a central directory, so that if you > > just invoke "info", you'll find a new entry. If you don't call install-info, > > you won't find it there and have to specify the full path, e.g. > > info /path/too/foo.info > > > > If you use INFO, this will be done automatically, the section will be > > inferred from the .info-file. > > > that's what I've done : You're right, I should have gone earlier to bed yesterday. Apologies for the hassle. -- http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/stolz/ *** PGP *** S/MIME Neu! Ändern Sie den Anfangstag Ihrer Woche