/usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server includes support for running the server within a FreeBSD jail. However, since jails do not provide access to bpfs, and since isc-dhcpd wants a bpf by default, running the server within a jail will not work unless one defines USE_SOCKETS within the isc-dhcpd source in the file includes/site.h However, doing this could break things if one decides to go from a jailed environment to one with access to bpfs, where using a socket may or may not be appropriate for the application. Fix: Define USE_SOCKETS in includes/site.h by removing comments around line 138 of includes/site.h How-To-Repeat: Build and install isc-dhcp3-server. Attempt to run in jail.
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 02:54:14PM -0800, Andrew Clark wrote: > Class should change from maintainer-update -> change-request. I'm not the > maintainer of the port, nor did I mean to appear as a maintainer. My > apologies. > > -- > Andrew Clark > Campus Network Programmer > University of California, Santa Barbara > andrew.clark@ucsb.edu (805) 893-5311
Class Changed From-To: maintainer-update->change-request Fix class.
State Changed From-To: open->feedback Forward PR to maintainer.
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->flz Grab.
> Dear maintainer, please have a look at the following PR : > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=76820 -- Florent Thoumie flz@xbsd.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Andrew, as I'm the new maintainer of the net/isc-dhcpd3-server i want to take care of your submitted PR ports/76820 from Sat Jan 29 17:20:03 GMT 2005. The PR shows your system as FreeBSD-4.10. So my question is, is this a special FreeBSD-4.X + jail issue or does the same apply to FreeBSD-5.x + jail? Sorry for the question, but i've currently no FreeBSD-4.X system around me. All my isc-dhcp3-server installations are running FreeBSD-5.X without jail. I will hopefully find some time at the weekend to install one system to reproduce and test this for myself, but in case i can't arrange it, some additional information from your side would be very helpful. regards Joerg - -- The beginning is the most important part of the work. -Plato -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCqYJJSPOsGF+KA+MRAgE4AKDFNnml6ixXOicmXrtyXbFRxUhgmACdFmP3 mBn0oF/i0tPKfeABFDqtjtc= =PS5u -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Responsible Changed From-To: flz->sem flz kindly allow to take it from him
Sorry for losing your response in my email. I have the inverse of your problem - I'm not running any FreeBSD 5 machines currently - so I can't really say if it is also a FreeBSD 5.x problem. -- Andrew Clark Campus Network Programmer Office of Information Technology University of California, Santa Barbara andrew.clark@ucsb.edu (805) 893-5311 --On Friday, June 10, 2005 02:06:29 PM +0200 Joerg Pulz <Joerg.Pulz@frm2.tum.de> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Hi Andrew, > > as I'm the new maintainer of the net/isc-dhcpd3-server i want to take > care of your submitted PR ports/76820 from Sat Jan 29 17:20:03 GMT > 2005. > > The PR shows your system as FreeBSD-4.10. > So my question is, is this a special FreeBSD-4.X + jail issue or does > the same apply to FreeBSD-5.x + jail? > > Sorry for the question, but i've currently no FreeBSD-4.X system > around me. All my isc-dhcp3-server installations are running > FreeBSD-5.X without jail. > > I will hopefully find some time at the weekend to install one system > to reproduce and test this for myself, but in case i can't arrange > it, some additional information from your side would be very helpful. > > regards > Joerg > > - -- The beginning is the most important part of the work. > -Plato > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) > > iD8DBQFCqYJJSPOsGF+KA+MRAgE4AKDFNnml6ixXOicmXrtyXbFRxUhgmACdFmP3 > mBn0oF/i0tPKfeABFDqtjtc= > =PS5u > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
State Changed From-To: feedback->closed Included in maintainer's ports/84057, thanks!